Peter D. Bommerito v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
Should the people in the state of California be constitutionally protected under the Fourteenth Amendment in the presence of increasingly severe criminal court processes and penalties in rulings and required by the state legislature, administrative policies, and public anti-crime initiatives?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : | f SHOULD THE PEOPLE IN THE SrANE OF CALIFORNIA a be CONSTITUTION ALLY PROTECTEO UNBER THE: me FOWRTEEN TH AMENBMENT (Nn THE PRESENCE OF, inceeas INGLY, SEVERE CRIMINAL CORY PROCESSES : AND PENALTAES IN FUICNEDS AND REQUIRED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE, ADMIN IS-TRATLUS Pol\ Ces, AND . | PUBUG ANTA= CRUDE INITIATIVES > ; | . 2. sworn THE PEOPLE AN) GASH STATE oF THE UNITE. . STATES ALSO BE so PROTECTED? ; . Oe