No. 18-7289

Peter D. Bommerito v. Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-policy ballot-initiatives civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process public-policy state-legislation
Latest Conference: 2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should the people in the state of California be constitutionally protected under the Fourteenth Amendment in the presence of increasingly severe criminal court processes and penalties in rulings and required by the state legislature, administrative policies, and public anti-crime initiatives?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : | f SHOULD THE PEOPLE IN THE SrANE OF CALIFORNIA a be CONSTITUTION ALLY PROTECTEO UNBER THE: me FOWRTEEN TH AMENBMENT (Nn THE PRESENCE OF, inceeas INGLY, SEVERE CRIMINAL CORY PROCESSES : AND PENALTAES IN FUICNEDS AND REQUIRED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE, ADMIN IS-TRATLUS Pol\ Ces, AND . | PUBUG ANTA= CRUDE INITIATIVES > ; | . 2. sworn THE PEOPLE AN) GASH STATE oF THE UNITE. . STATES ALSO BE so PROTECTED? ; . Oe

Docket Entries

2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-22
Waiver of right of respondents Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al. to respond filed.
2018-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)

Attorneys

Peter D. Bommerito
Peter D. Bommerito Jr. — Petitioner
Peter D. Bommerito Jr. — Petitioner
Ralph Diaz, Acting Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
Toni Raven Johns-EstavilleOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toni Raven Johns-EstavilleOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent