Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate constitutional rights?

No question identified. : y = QUESTION [S] PRESENTED Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate constitutional rights? If the State of Arizona can legally apply the Arizona Revised Statute § 123201 to pro per Defendants constitutionally, when there has been no prior litigation between the parties, no history of vexatious litigation, no documented record of Substantive Findings of Frivolousness of either party and no finality in the current live litigation. If the state of Arizona applies the vexatious litigant law to a Defendant prior to finality and makes the determination public, does this violate the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the State of Arizona can maintain a statutory law that is ambiguous and serves no compelling state interest when applied to pro per Defendants. If the State of Arizona can hold hearing[s] in advance of the officially ‘ noticed date without proper notice to all parties of the scheduled hearing change, to determine if a litigant is to be determined vexatious in their absence. ii y 3 If the State of Arizona applies the A.R.S. § 12-3201 to a pro per Defendant, then narrowly tapers the restrictions through an Appellate Court order on remand to nullify the application of A.R.S. § 12-3201 statute to render any restrictions inert and to be limited to the current live litigation only. Making any determination of vexatiousness only referenceable. Does Making any determination referenceable violate a pro per Defendant's Right of Access to Justice Under the Rule of Law when the errant ruling will inhibit the right to file a Wrongful Institution of Civil Proceedings, See Ackerman v. Kaufinan, 41 Ariz. 110, 112-114, 15 P.2d 966, 967 (1932). ili XxX XN