Does Petitioner have standing to sue Defendants for violating Petitioner's copyrighted intellectual property and constitutional rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing | to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Wester District of Oklahoma eleven Defendants, four of whom reside in Oklahoma, the rest in Washington, DC, and Florida, who have maliciously and | discreetly acted in concert to achieve their Trumpist MAGA racist and misogynist agenda for America by making unconstitutional anti-abortion legislation in violation of Petitioner's original copyrighted intellectual property entitled the CCO Network that was minutely and articulately expressed as a legal playwright scenario in two tangible media [4 printed pages, A: 11-14, anda 2014 4-hour full-feature motion picture available 24/7 on DUTMOVIES.COM, A: 25-28] to help law enforcers to effectively detect and prosecute criminal conspiracies? 2. Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a male U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to respectfully and urgently request that this U.S. Supreme Court declares null and void Appellees’ Oklahoma Senate Bill 612 or SB 612, and/or any U.S. State’s statutes banning almost all types of abortions, which were and still are legal and allowed by this Court's 1973 Constitutional Roe v. Wade ruling? 3. In the event, all elected Democratic and Republican representatives and leaders of America have publicly failed to perform their duties of defending and upholding the most important values, highest goals, and principles of the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, would a U.S. citizen have both the sacred duty and legal standing to move a U.S. Court of competent jurisdiction or ultimately SCOTUS to unmask and hold accountable racist and misogynist criminals, such as the Appellees herein, who have acted in concert under color of law by misrepresentations of fact or law to rape and murder innocent child-bearing-aged (CBA) women, sometimes as young as 10 years of age, in egregious violation of their constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, privacy, and pursuit of happiness, the 13" and 14" Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the 1866 and 1964 Civil Rights Acts, and the constitutional Roe v. Wade ruling by this Court in 1973? 2