No. 21-582
Mark Lee Dickson v. Whole Woman's Health, et al.
Tags: abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review reproductive-rights severability standing stare-decisis state-law supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should the Court overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)? 2. Should the Court overrule Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 1386 S. Ct. 2292 (2016), which refused to enforce an explicit severability requirement in a state abortion statute? (i)
Docket Entries
2021-12-16
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Mark Lee Dickson
Jonathan F. Mitchell — Mitchell Law PLLC, Petitioner
Jonathan F. Mitchell — Mitchell Law PLLC, Petitioner