No. 21-583
Stephen Brint Carlton, et al. v. Whole Woman's Health, et al.
Tags: abortion abortion-rights civil-rights constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process judicial-precedent judicial-review reproductive-rights stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent texas-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Court should overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 118 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). (I)
Docket Entries
2021-12-16
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due November 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Stephen Brint Carlton, et al.
Judd Edward Stone II — Texas Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
Judd Edward Stone II — Texas Attorney General's Office, Petitioner