No. 19-677

Dave Yost, et al. v. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-11-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 42-usc-1988 abortion-providers abortion-rights article-iii article-iii-standing attorney-fees civil-rights patient-rights preliminary-injunction prevailing-party standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-07-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do abortion providers have Article III standing to assert the rights of their patients?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do abortion providers have Article III standing to assert the rights of their patients? 2. When, if ever, does a plaintiff who wins a preliminary injunction, but who never wins a final judgment on the merits, qualify as a “prevailing party” entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988?

Docket Entries

2020-07-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.
2020-06-29
Supplemental brief of petitioners Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, et al. filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2020-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-04
Reply of petitioners Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, et al. filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2020-02-26
Brief of respondents Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2020-01-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 27, 2020 to February 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2020-01-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 26, 2020.
2019-12-26
Brief amici curiae of Georgia, et al. filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2019-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2020.
2019-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2019 to January 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2019-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, et al.
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Petitioner
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Petitioner
Georgia, et al.
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Amicus
Andrew Alan Pinson — Office of the Georgia Attorney General, Amicus
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, et al.
Jennifer Lynn Branch — Gerhardstein & Branch Co LPA, Respondent
Jennifer Lynn Branch — Gerhardstein & Branch Co LPA, Respondent