No. 22-6937

Robert L. Davis v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-06
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 28-usc-1915 access-to-courts civil-rights court-access cruel-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment first-amendment pro-se-litigant redress
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a lifetime ban to courts under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) unless one pays in full deny due process violating the 14th amendment right to seek redress?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION # ONE ° Does A Lifetime Ban TO Courts Unolev 28 U.S.C. $1215 @) Unless One Pays InFull Deny Due Process Violating The 43+ Amenelment Right +o Seek Re olress ° , __QUueSTION # TWO . When Does The 3-strick Bau For Frivolous Ov Failuve To State A Claim Violate The Pro Se Libevally. Construe. Doctrine ? QUES TION#THREE Does The Lifetime Ban To Courts Unelev 2¥ U.S.C. § 12/5 @) Without A Safty-Net Violate The Sm Amenel | ~ment Against Crule Anol Unusual Pun} Shment ° QUESTION + Fou : Does Allowing The Same Judge tn Which An APPeal Ts Taken TO Provent The APPellant TO APPeal Anol Or In Forma fauPevis Violate A Conflict OF Intevest Protected By Pue Process ?

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Robert L. Davis
Robert L. Davis — Petitioner
Robert L. Davis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent