Whether Petitioner's health, safety and welfare were protected while living in unsafe housing contaminated with mold

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED REVIEW POINT I: Whether Petitioner’s Health, Safety and Welfare were protected and attentive while living in unsafe housings particular contaminated with mold. REVIEW POINT II: Whether the Supreme Court of Florida and other courts erred in not applying next step rules, statues and citations of authorities in their Denied decisions, partly and not entirely to the Petitioner’s specific requests, motions and petitions, etc. oo. REVIEW POINT III: Whether, the outcome of any Court’s decisions, specifically involving health safeness deserves Rehearing. The basis of Rehearing a question of great public importance. (See Fla.R. App. P 9.120 and 9.210)