| 25-5879 |
Michael Allen v. Fidencio N. Guzman, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-10-15 |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedRelisted (6)IFP |
constitutional-rights counsel-appointment due-process liberty-interest penal-code racial-justice-act |
(1) Lower Courts violated United States Constitution 14th Amendment Due Process Right To State Created Liberty Interest To newly enacted 2020 Californ… |
| 24-7199 |
Alcenios Martinez, aka Aucensio Lopez v. Texas |
Texas |
2025-05-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-right counsel-appointment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance state-review trial-procedure |
1. Is a defendant constitutionally entitled to the appointment of
counsel for the initial review of an ineffective assistance of
trial counsel claim… |
| 24-6617 |
Cedric Dwayne Poore v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2025-02-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-right counsel-appointment critical-stage dna-act hearsay-exception post-conviction-procedure |
1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals ruling that an omitted
claim implicating an excited utterance, an exception to the hearsay rule, is… |
| 23-6491 |
Peyton John Wesley Hopson v. Deborah S. Hunt |
Sixth Circuit |
2024-01-18 |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-good-cause certificate-of-good-faith circuit-court counsel-appointment district-court due-process jurisdiction right-to-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-circuit |
Did the Sixth Circuit lose jurisdiction to proceed to review where the Sixth Circuit failed to comply with the Sixth Amendment requirement to appoint … |
| 22-7579 |
Keith Grant Schneider v. Florida |
Florida |
2023-05-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
anders-brief anders-v-california appellate-procedure appellate-review constitutional-right counsel-appointment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment |
Where the initial review collateral proceeding is the first designated proceeding for a prisoner to raise a claim of infective assistance of counsel a… |
| 22-7169 |
Scott Teevan v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence appointment-of-counsel circuit-split counsel-appointment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance perjury standard-of-review |
Will, this court resolve a circuit split regarding the Standard of Review used for actual innocence?
Should this court grant habeas litigants the abi… |
| 22-6498 |
Joseph T. Shine-Johnson v. David W. Gray, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-01-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
agency counsel-appointment discretionary-review due-process federal-appellate-review habeas-corpus indigent-counsel sixth-amendment state-government |
1. Whether due process extends to the State government opting to assign an indigent petitioner appointed counsel on discretionary Review and if due pr… |
| 22-6113 |
Guillermo Garcia v. James Hill, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appeal-denial civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-appointment district-court due-process legal-error motion-to-appeal petition petition-review standing |
1. WHETER THE LOowER cOvRT MADE A LECAL ERROR .
5 AFL
WHEW DENYEW C HIS DPPEAL , WAE A OF?
PETLZIOW SHARE CORE OF OF EGRATAOVE AYIETS
DN COMMON WUT FH… |
| 21-7844 |
James R. W. Mitchell v. Raymond Madden, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-05-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
counsel-appointment court-discretion criminal-defendant criminal-procedure faretta-right faretta-v-california mccoy-v-louisiana right-to-counsel right-to-self-representation self-representation sixth-amendment |
In Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806 (1975), this Court held that a criminal defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial. I… |
| 21-7798 |
Francisco Manuel Padilla v. California |
California |
2022-05-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights counsel-appointment criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal right-to-counsel standard-of-review |
1. DID THE COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION, AND THEREBY VIOLATE APPELLANT'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, WHEN IT DENIED HIS MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS PLEAS?
2. DID… |
| 21-7493 |
Thomas Carl Bruni v. Craig Apple, Sheriff, Albany County, New York |
Second Circuit |
2022-03-29 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights counsel-appointment due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing |
Question not identified. |
| 21-6716 |
Fernando Romero v. Neil McDowell, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-12-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion counsel-appointment district-court-discretion expert-opinion ineffective-assistance investigation pro-se right-to-counsel state-court-claim |
Whether the district court abused its discretion by denying petitioner's motion to appoint counsel when petitioner presented a substantial claim of in… |
| 21-5170 |
Patricia A. McColm v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-07-22 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel civil-rights counsel-appointment court-procedure disability-accommodation dismissal-with-prejudice due-process exceptional-circumstances judicial-discretion medically-verified-limitations ninth-circuit standing |
1. Did the Ninth Circuit err in not finding an appropriate issue for appeal, where the
magistrate judge failed to find that medically verified permane… |
| 21-5067 |
Lonnie Ray Wiseman v. Patti Wachtendorf, Warden, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-07-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-procedure complex-legal-issues counsel-appointment custody-transfer federal-custody habeas-corpus legal-representation primary-jurisdiction writ-of-custody writ-of-habeas-corpus |
(1) Whether the Eighth Circuit erred in refusing to order the government to produce a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum —as the Tenth Circuit did … |
| 20-6700 |
Melissa Calabrese v. California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-12-23 |
Denied |
IFP |
28-usc-1915 americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights civil-rights
20-66" collateral-order-doctrine counsel-appointment district-court-order due-process in-forma-pauperis moral-rights property-development recognized-stature standing statutory-damages visual-artists-rights-act Whether the Due Process Clause permits imposing st |
Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(… |
| 20-6686 |
Benjamon Ray Stewart v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-22 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel-appointment due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel federal-criminal-procedure habeas-corpus standing supreme-court-review |
Question not identified. |
| 20-549 |
John Farrow, et al. v. Contra Costa County, California |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-10-26 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
bail circuit-split counsel-appointment criminal-procedure critical-stage due-process equal-protection indigent-defense right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Is a detainee's first appearance in court a "critical stage" of the proceedings, when bail is set and statutory liberty interests are adjudicated, as … |
| 19-8067 |
Abdul Mohammed v. DuPage Legal Assistance Foundation, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-03-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ada americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights counsel-appointment disability-rights due-process judicial-procedure medical-records mental-health reasonable-accommodation rehabilitation-act standing |
1) whether a Plaintiff with physical and mental disabilities in an Americans with Disabilities Act action need to reveal all his/her medical and menta… |
| 19-7136 |
Karen Lynn McClaflin v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-12-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
affidavit appeal appellate-procedure cja-appointment counsel-appointment criminal-justice-act criminal-justice-act-1964 criminal-procedure due-process fee-waiver in-forma-pauperis prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing standing writ-of-certiorari |
Question not identified. |
| 19-5784 |
Michael Villecco v. Daniel W. Stark, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-09-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-procedure appointed-counsel appointment-of-counsel civil-litigation civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-order-doctrine counsel-appointment district-court-order due-process interlocutory-appeal standing |
Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying the appointment of counsel in civil cases. |
| 19-5254 |
Jose Arroyo v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2019-07-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
corpus-delicti counsel-appointment criminal-procedure discovery dna-evidence due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sexual-conduct witness-statement |
Did the State fail to prove the corpus delicti of charges alleging penetration and sexual conduct with Jose Arroyo's mouth where the only proof of tho… |
| 18-9362 |
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-05-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability counsel-appointment federal-habeas-proceeding habeas-corpus motion-for-counsel motion-for-discovery ninth-circuit pro-se pro-se-petition |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in construing a pro se petitioner's appeal |
| 18-7373 |
Warren Ray Patton v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-01-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence counsel-appointment dna-testing due-process habeas-corpus liberty-interest postconviction-proceedings postconviction-relief |
Whether the State's substantive procedures for obtaining appointment of counsel and DNA testing in postconviction proceedings create a protected due p… |
| 18-7275 |
Thomas Powers v. Jennifer Block, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-01-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-detainee civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel-appointment due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment mental-health mental-health-treatment retaliation standing treatment-program |
Whether the Supreme Court should define the elements of the Constitution's adequate civil detainee treatment program |
| 18-5419 |
Kevin Griffin v. Thomas DiNapoli |
Second Circuit |
2018-07-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment 6th-amendment appeal-dismissal appellate-procedure appointment-of-counsel civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights counsel-appointment due-process fourteenth-amendment in-forma-pauperis sixth-amendment standing |
Was petitioner erroneously denied in forma pauperis, appointment of counsel, and appeal dismissal? |