No. 19-5784
Michael Villecco v. Daniel W. Stark, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appointed-counsel appointment-of-counsel civil-litigation civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-order-doctrine counsel-appointment district-court-order due-process interlocutory-appeal standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying the appointment of counsel in civil cases
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying the appointment of counsel in civil cases. ‘ ii
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-03
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2019 to January 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 3, 2020.
2019-10-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 4, 2019.
2019-10-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2019 to December 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2019.
2019-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 3, 2019 to November 4, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 3, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent