Whether the Texas' 'procedural' scheme for addressing claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal denies petitioner his fundamental right to counsel and due process under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Z. ~ Latre, To etSleae . The SC,0fUS., £0 Teeino v, Thee (335. ct, (9) said that Tenas, Sxcouse aC a Failed “Procedural” Scheme * Cy ote: Texas eure” BlowS the insets 0-4 Their oan Courk, Te Coa fess, Fa b issQt, irc kx Pol hacia 2 65 3.56 to Back the Sc sf, laTrevissl. tha leFFor Addressing desea) ve Assistance s€ Teial Counse( claims, is Deny ing (a2£ Wes Eut ia nw their RBUR CAS aCorded bo thea by the Sfpmus-in vitts cf Uiey Y 14S. $8 ) fe haya Counsel to prepare ond preset thoer LA ck Retive AsSistance 0€ Trial Counser claims ord ireot Appeal. Fam We { Gene is, Scheme” Pam Lrrocat, Appeia fea Corrsel on Afpeul was oft y A Me u Wed } SiSttace. of Triate OMs( outside of fR. Record obe iously teallo HG 2) day Window # File nofic, forwes Trial folapse( the Lecorg? pleaswere “TS Kady Wetland, Foruse OUL/AS the Do esr hs ly doo) Be File motion Goes Wviar Hhab<s mordehory Ppresewe eres vb fen EretteAtr Wlaliouse Se they Carte daiser orbived appeal 20 1 88, “by Kh Lovasel ts (ely Go The SGMUS SO in Gut sU Lb oCary YEF U.S >332) Sopcould wo Lang er YSE Sian MOT 04 Fe preserae said Erers Fer prése tition on Di fet Ap pea | ~ oo Happes b ev0r body » The Appea | eh, Eg nored amy timely arg endless, Compacats ard Ewas thus, a5 C2uatl€s5 Loos o€ Oh AMeicars ar e~ Derj ek my Brght have G Catuy e& prteare, MA PMS At my sbstartia L, Md Sub Sfar pHated( Ee pid Firally GR & Fanrlameubeto pur The Recor He Stade Wi trteld® Fo anme) ~— claims oF fa eFfectiva Assistina of Wial Cocnsel ong irer Aypeal, Ad This Cost Rr gut to Laurse} Der jed ae, ae it Does 3 Somary 6 thes Their Fenda ertat Bight & bve prowess, anda GicWvial,.. Ali because They wee dot oble te ReCiPUr Conti tt onally havronfees “minimum abe haurde™ thad they are, weare, Arti tied ty) to ake ovr Afpra! Seng cate wa CCHetine, pacdhvally oa the'manits” bo asegvatelr wt ee \uely A fee | The Fn Tustin se € Eneelediim AssrStace of Lose] OFM AL so ARA Funda Meshal MPSCAMIEge of SuUstia willocer b a2, ard Lovatlers o thes LE the se Con sti ttional Aauanrtees are Lot FulPilleg with ew Preedet hy AMOMag Trev l10 vs thale-, fe gine “Aha” Rels ef whl, said Weoley PhaleCase Renries, art wheel fhe $.GOTUS: Loar o FECIYS Ur Luter 09% wr, by Ley of Lorrtet , Ee » abecs Deli. CPalsedalimy claras in Appeal lowh eae. Att Tyres Danred Trstice dy state Appeal Cavrt: rraisag The clarms in Shute Hoheos Cowl Tria ~iAus Oishi lawh ausrr hey. Court oF Appeals FLL etreuit(iho PECKENs: Kase rnCon Fuck with SGARuS. precedat to TabsAnlog Tu iscchien fo Reuter M7 olasns) ard Ay Cowtlys haus he & Sd, despite oath of hve. na Artic YE of Our YS. Conghituton te Mefead OUrUS. CASINO. Mrebploug fe lh — Cons onal Lav rantee, oAveL, Le edn Deepre® 55, Orta Felrtrte| fo please vadestard, that an Hue by Basestia, ma sorcrite D wanlaa of AMawag Termes bamy midg -F theeadouse Maprisay — 5 wot (Help~ Ord 0 F ask Fe“Honor Ard Pat ac * Gon Ths ort, ~~ Pf (4a 325 “Sx @ Does the Slots, IEA Treviaa van Tha fe Abo, exfledt frat BYMAbEC’ The Gastithonaily & Olechers A d 4 =— Preset — Their br eceechne Met 2 dealy be alte B prea, td us. a EA € fective Assistance of trial Ce wAse| clasms tn the ‘SDISWIA Cour 5 Bld they o : “nh, wT EAT OG y SYSt In fentionally © g 20¢e Whats [xheessity oF ae Patsy ee, A hes Crilped | by then Selves jx Butts Lepelestly Rorbidding’ ao the Scotus. pays G44 Wi Mout a lawye fe 4 55159? ° “Cer pese, be he, QQ shod The US. Dy'strick Coen t Appoiat ' , Co -~ o thew st, fo Huber 5 Comes peti hen. ra Aaehiey Ke Aske, ° Fe SALIA, Thy; hi ete Te RAG, Ok in phe “ rae ee. tee ss Sfirce of Wa | CovASe! ant Relaked . PEN TION Rr Las Ved Counsel oro thew, ° j > . 4 ‘ia, do fe the False pro Cede Scheme” Ja states + ke Teycews , For Adldres sing the sata CMI mS OXDITRA Aflaeal, Cas Dest~ieed tr the Cause of Ex parte Karcia TBCE WIR SES Ln PexasoWn® Justices Meala ong Polson, fA Con Resi 20, by “Blowing te histon their Ownlerst Just subsiontvadte Ce Clarins of the Seatus, in TErine Lr thule (32 5 c