No. 21-7798
Francisco Manuel Padilla v. California
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-appointment criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion plea-bargaining plea-withdrawal right-to-counsel standard-of-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court abuse its discretion and violate the appellant's constitutional rights by denying his motion to withdraw his pleas?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2022)
Attorneys
Francisco M. Padilla
Francisco M. Padilla — Petitioner