No. 21-7493

Thomas Carl Bruni v. Craig Apple, Sheriff, Albany County, New York

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability civil-rights counsel-appointment due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-05-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does appellant prove exemption from certificate of appealability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION ONE. Does APPELLANT PhoVE EXEMPTION FRoM ‘C.0.A“ CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ? QUFStioN Twa -bpID THE SECOND CiRCUM DEVIATE FROM THE NoRMAL APPELLATE PRACTICE? QUESTION THREE 1S IT IMMEADIATLY IMPORTANT To NATIONAL | SECURITY AND FoR NEW YoRK To BE A FREE STATE INVOLV/NG How ANDREW CUOMO AND SHERIFF CRAIG APPLE RoBBEO ALL DEFENDANTS oF ALL LAW Books INSTITUTING A FoRCED RAPIDLY EVoLVING FRAUDULENT CHINESE CoMMUNIST PARTY BIG TecHNO NATIVE INTERNATIONAL ESPIONAGE. TasLet MERGER WHILE | PROMOTING MARXISt Riots With MAYoR CATHY SHEEHAN 7 | QUESTION FoukKARE MASKS UNCoNStItUTIONAL IN A SCHooL oR A CodRt RooM oR AFTER A PERSON IS MEDICALLY CLEAR / RecoRDING To The. Count! /states owN Policy ? QUESTION FIVE SHOULD THE StaTE BE REQUIRED Jo /SSUE A WARRANT UPoN PROBABLE CAUSE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING WHY A PERSON IN A CouRtT OR OTHERWISE 15 MANDATED to WEAR A MASK? ; AUESTION SiXDUE To THE ToTALITY OF CIRCUMSTANCES WAS APPELLANT REaUIREO APPoINtEO coUNSEL aND Entitled To AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING? -AUEStinNl SEVEN DOES APPELLANT MEET His BURDoN Fo\ FEDERAL INGUNcTION INVOLVING REQUIRED CAse LAW? . 2 oF 26

Docket Entries

2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2021-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Thomas C. Bruni
Thomas C. Bruni — Petitioner