No. 20-6700

Melissa Calabrese v. California, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-12-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-1915 americans-with-disabilities-act civil-rights civil-rights 20-66" collateral-order-doctrine counsel-appointment district-court-order due-process in-forma-pauperis moral-rights property-development recognized-stature standing statutory-damages visual-artists-rights-act Whether the Due Process Clause permits imposing st
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) for an in forma pauperis Plaintiff

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the collateral order doctrine permits the immediate appeal of a district court order denying appoint| ment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) for an in | forma pauperis Plaintiff, who is bled [never able to provide for her own food or clothing or shelter with high suicidality] who was denied her Americans with Disabilities Act 42 U.S.C. § 12101 rights.

Docket Entries

2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-25
Reply of petitioner Melissa Calabrese filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-20
Brief of respondent Providence St. Joseph Health and Mission Hospital in opposition filed.
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Melissa Calabrese
Melissa Calabrese — Petitioner
Providence St. Joseph Health and Mission Hospital
Curtis Chapin Holmes IIWest & Rosa LLP, Respondent