Whether the appellate court has a duty to conduct a full review of the record under Anders v. California when appointed counsel files an Anders brief in an initial review collateral proceeding that is the first designated proceeding for a prisoner to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Where the initial review collateral proceeding is the first designated proceeding for a prisoner to raise a claim of infective assistance of counsel and an appeal is taken, does the appellate court, after appointing counsel for that appeal have a duty, under . Anders v. California to conduct a full review of the record where appointed counsel has filed an Anders Brief? -Ze