No. 18-9362
Timothy Stuart Ring v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability counsel-appointment federal-habeas-proceeding habeas-corpus motion-for-counsel motion-for-discovery ninth-circuit pro-se pro-se-petition
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in construing a pro se petitioner's appeal
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in construing a pro se petitioner’s appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as only a request for a certificate of appealability on the merits of his habeas petition, and not also an appeal from the court’s orders denying his motion for counsel and from its failure to even rule on his motion for discovery during the federal habeas proceeding. (i)
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-24
Waiver of right of respondent Charles Ryan to respond filed.
2019-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2019)
2019-03-07
Application (18A912) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 20, 2019.
2019-03-06
Application (18A912) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 21, 2019 to May 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Charles Ryan
Jeffrey Lee Sparks — Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Jeffrey Lee Sparks — Arizona Attorney General, Respondent
Timothy Stuart Ring
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Petitioner
Jeffrey T. Green — Sidley Austin, Petitioner