Did the State fail to prove the corpus delicti of charges alleging penetration and sexual conduct with Jose Arroyo's mouth where the only proof of those acts was Arroyo's own statement?

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Did the State fail to prove the corpué delicti of charges alle ging . : penetration and sexual conduct with Jose Arroyo’s mouth where the only proof of those acts was Arroyo’s own statement? . ; II. After reviewing discovery, Arroyo’s appointed counsel moved for an independent expert analysis of the State’s DNA evidence. The State, citing the high costs of an independent DNA analysis, moved to remove outside. ; , counsel, and the court appointed a public defender. Where the public . defender then refused to obtain an independent DNA analysis, did he _ prejudice Arroyo, justifying the re-appointment of outside counsel? Ill. Did the circuit court fail to conduct a proper Krankel hearing when , _ Arroyo raised several allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel in his pro ' se post-trial motion? : oo. |