No. 22-832
Michael A. Caldwell, et al. v. Joseph M. Gasper, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director, Michigan State Police, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1981 civil-rights civil-rights-act discrimination diversity-initiative employment employment-discrimination gender-preference protected-activity race-preference title-vii
Key Terms:
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether opposition to an employer's 'Diversity Initiative' (non-remedial race and gender preferences) constitutes protected activity under 42 USC § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether opposition to an employer’s “Diversity Initiative” (non-remedial race and gender preferences) constitutes protected activity under 42 USC § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-03-30
Waiver of right of respondents Joseph M. Gasper and the Michigan State Police to respond filed.
2023-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Joseph M. Gasper and the Michigan State Police
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Michael A. Caldwell, et al.
James K. Fett — Fett & Fields, P.C., Petitioner
James K. Fett — Fett & Fields, P.C., Petitioner