No. 22-6907
Jeremy Jermaine Cumbie v. Texas
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cruel-unusual-punishment due-process evidence evidence-outside-record outside-the-record record sentencing trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment CriminalProcedure
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Cumbie denied due process when the court considered evidence outside the record in assessing the sentence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WAS MR. CUMBIE DENIED DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW WHEN THE COURT CONSIDERED EVIDENCE OUTSIDE THE RECORD IN ASSESSING THE SENTENCE ? Il. DID THE TRIAL COURT’S REFUSAL TO CONSIDER THE FULL RANGE OF PUNISHMENT VIOLATE MR. CUMBIE’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS? I. DID THE EIGHT-YEAR SENTENCE IMPOSED ON MR. CUMBIE CONSTITUTE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT? i
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Jeremy Cumbie
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
Amy Ruth Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner