No. 22-6832

James L. Mahaffey v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: cell-phones criminal-procedure digital-evidence fourth-amendment privacy search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the government's warrantless search of a person's cell phone violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : THE PETITIONER PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING QUESTION(s): 1. “The Petitioner respectfully ask”. When the [Flramers of the Oklahoma State Constitution, created and enacted Article I § 3, [Unappropriated public lands Indian Lands Jurisdiction of United States], did the State of Oklahoma and/or its Official(s) “forever” disclaim and/or waive jurisdiction within Indian Country? ? 2. “The Petitioner respectfully ask’: [Although the Petitioner is Native], is [Rlace a critical element in criminal proceeding(s) within the State of Oklahoma? Or will this destroy a century of justice reform and the abolishment of racism within our Jurisprudence? * 8. “The Petitioner respectfully ask”. What Congressional Law/Statute grants Oklahoma “concurrent jurisdiction” within Indian Country, found within the borders of the State of Oklahoma? 4 2 As Congress took care to require Oklahoma to agree and declare that it would forever disclaim all right and title in or to ... all lands lying within [the State’s] limits owned or held by any Indian, tribe, or nation. 34 Stat. 270. > Quoting the Honorable Neil Gorsuch 3 This question is extremely vital to the Petitioner’s case as he was personally racially discriminated against be the State Judge(s) in this case. The Black Lives Mater Organization has completely deterred the Court(s) from racially discriminating against Americans of color, (black), and the Courts have now turned their racism towards Native American(s). This “critical” element adopted by Oklahoma will subject every citizen to racism for an eternity and/or until this Honorable Court removes the race from the elements and mandates that the Federal Government has sole jurisdiction of Major Crimes Act and the Tribes have sole jurisdiction pursuant to the General Crimes Act. Oklahoma simply has zero jurisdiction within Indian country, regardless of race. 4 This question arises from this Honorable Court's ruling of “Oklahoma ve. Castro-Huerta’ No. 21-429 (April 27, 2022). Page 2 of 18

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 24, 2023)

Attorneys

James Mahaffey
James L. Mahaffey — Petitioner
James L. Mahaffey — Petitioner