Did the 11th US Court of Appeals err in affirming the Bankruptcy Court's use of an arbitrary Nunc Pro Tunc technique after a willful violation of the automatic stay?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . fo oo Did the 11th US. Comt Of Appeals err when the 3 Judge Panel & 12 JudgeEne mo Bane Panel Per Curiam issued the 11-2-21 Opinion Affirming the Bankruptey use of 8 . ° . : ati Arbitrary Nunc Pro Tunc Technique after the Willful Violation of 5-14-15, that mA oS “is in direct conflict with the Supreme Court 2-24-20 Archdiocese V. Acevedo, Et os : “2. Does not the lack of enforcement of this Case lead to total disrespect for Acevedo, . : ; 7 making it moot with a ripple effect for U.S. Supreme Court Justices diminishment 7 ; , & . of past ‘current, future Opinions/ authority over all the Lower Tribunals & ; 7 . z : -Tadges below; encourage, (not discourage) future abuse of process, affecting entity(s) “The : & person(s) now certain to experience continued Willful Violations, weakening 11 ; Me ue “USC: 362 Automatic Stay & 362()(1); leading to billions, trillions of $ of : ma ‘ontiscations; foreclosures? — eo af