1. Whether the Appellant's Pre-Miranda Statements was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona., 384 U.S. 436 (1966)?

2. Whether the prosecutor's summation exceeded the standards enunciated in Darden v. Wainwright , All U.S. 168 (1986) and whether this summation violated Appellant's due process right to a fair trial

3. Whether the district court's decision on ineffective assistance of counsel claims contrary to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) and whether the Appellant's rights were violated by this

4. Whether the district court failure to utilize the Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) standard in analyzing Appellant's insufficient evidence claim a violation of Appellant's right to a fair trial

5. Whether the testimony of the state's gang expert witness (and testimony of gang affiliation) violated Appellant's due process right to a fair trial and whether the district court erred in denying this issue

6. Whether the district court decision contrary to Appellant's sixth amendment right to a fair trial when the state was allowed to introduced testimony/ evidence of an uncharged crime?

7. Whether the Extensive Media Exposure and Publicity impacted the fairness of the trial and whether district court decision was contrary to Shepard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) and Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961)?

Whether the Appellant's Pre-Miranda Statements was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona