No. 22-6483
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure impartial-jury jury-selection prejudicial sixth-amendment trial-procedure voir-dire
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the voir dire selection was partial or prejudicial, in violation of Petitioner, Eli Sloan's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED i. Whether the voir dire selection was partial or prejudicial, in violation of Petitioner, Eli Sloan's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. -i1 :
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-04-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-03-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent