No. 22-6922

Samuel Ross v. Clerk of Courts of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights civil-rights-action extraordinary-circumstance fed-r-civ-p-60(b)(6) lewis-v-casey prisoner-rights rule-60(b)(6)
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the majority Circuit Court of Appeal decisions clarifying that Lewis v. Casey does not foreclose a prisoner's right to access to courts to litigate a civil rights action 'interference' claim unrelated to his incarceration should constitute an extraordinary circumstance to warrant relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the majority Circuit Court of Appeal decisions clarifying that Lewis v. Casey does not foreclose a prisoner’s right to access to courts to litigate a civil rights action ‘interference’ claim unrelated to his incarceration should constitute an extraordinary circumstance to warrant relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)?

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)

Attorneys

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross — Petitioner
Samuel Ross — Petitioner