No. 22-6876

Haroun Bacchus v. Misty Thomson, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment fraud-allegations litigation-process procedural-due-process standing united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-04-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the civil procedures performed in both cases violate the requirements of procedural due process of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED During the lengthy litigation in these matters, petitioner exposed fraudulent documents that were filed by the defense with the trial court. The question concerns procedural due process errors and violations for the then consolidated cases to be reviewed. The question presented under Rule 14.1(a)) is: Whether the civil procedures performed in both cases violate the requirements of procedural due process of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. i

Docket Entries

2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2022-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 30, 2023)

Attorneys

Haroun Bacchus
Haroun Bacchus — Petitioner
Haroun Bacchus — Petitioner