No. 21-1543
Jane Doe, aka Beeism v. Jomy Sterling
Response RequestedRelisted (4)
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy
FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-04-28
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the proper standard of review to be applied in determining whether a party may obtain a subpoena compelling the identification an anonymous speaker on the service provider's online platform?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. What is the proper standard of review to be applied in determining whether a party may obtain a subpoena compelling the identification an anonymous speaker on the service provider’s online platform? 2. Do Florida and California statutes’ substantive prohibitions on strategic lawsuits against public participation apply to foreclose such an action in federal courts?
Docket Entries
2023-05-01
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
2023-04-20
Rescheduled.
2023-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-13
Rescheduled.
2023-03-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-17
Reply of petitioner Jane Doe aka Beeism filed.
2023-03-02
Brief of respondent Jomy Sterling in opposition filed.
2023-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2023.
2023-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response submitted to The Clerk.
2022-09-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 3, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
2022-08-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2022 to October 1, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-01
Response Requested. (Due August 31, 2022)
2022-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Jane Doe aka Beeism
Adam Colby Losey — Losey PLLC, Petitioner