| 25-1037 |
Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. Jabari Morese Lyles |
Maryland |
2026-03-03 |
Pending |
|
arbitration-agreements arbitration-enforcement contract-assignment Federal-Arbitration-Act preemption state-court-rules |
Does the Federal Arbitration Act preempt a state court rule that prohibits an assignee of a financing contract from enforcing an arbitration provision… |
| 23-356 |
Donnie T. A. M. Kern v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2023-10-04 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
14th-amendment civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-order due-process oral-argument procedural-rules property-rights standing state-court-rules virginia-supreme-court |
1. On January 12 2023, the Virginia Supreme Court ordered the Petitioner: "[A]ppellant shall have until February 19 2023 to file a notice of appeal in… |
| 22-752 |
Bi Rite Auto Transport, Inc., et al. v. Russell Dilday, et al. |
California |
2023-02-10 |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment appeal appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment procedural-due-process standing state-court-rules state-law |
1. Is California's scheme of procedural due process in its Code of Civil Procedure and Civil Rules of Court satisfactory of constitutionally protected… |
| 19-8394 |
Paul Anthony Hatton v. Douglas L. Combs, Justice, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-05-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-1983 appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech judicial-enforcement standing state-court-rules state-supreme-court subject-matter-jurisdiction |
WHETHER THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO EXERCISE THEIR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO HEAR A 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ACTION SEEKING TO HAVE A … |
| 19-7722 |
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2020-02-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations criminal-appeals due-process federal-procedural-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure standing state-court-rules state-statutes statutory-interpretation supreme-court-error |
ARE ALL STATES MANDATED BY ANY U.S. PROVISIONS TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULE 11 BY ADOPTING THEIR OWN SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL R… |
| 19-7163 |
Paul Anthony Hatton v. Douglas L. Combs, Justice, Supreme Court of Oklahoma, et al. |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-01-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-1983 appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process federal-court-jurisdiction federal-courts federal-jurisdiction judicial-enforcement standing state-court-rules state-courts state-supreme-court subject-matter-jurisdiction |
WHETHER THE FEDERAL COURTS HAVE AN AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO EXERCISE THEIR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO HEAR A 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ACTION SEEKING TO HAVE A … |
| 18-9116 |
Jesus Cotto v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-05-02 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certiorari-petition compliance-exception due-process exhaustion-of-remedies federal-court-discretion federal-court-review federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-review post-conviction procedural-default procedural-rules state-court-determination state-court-rules state-courts |
I). "Whether Federal Courts May Excuse A Petitioner's Failure To Comply With The State Court's Procedural Rules, Notwithstanding The State Court's Det… |
| 18-8430 |
Juan Bosco Alvarez v. Debbie Asuncion, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 aedpa constitutional-claim due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-court federal-review habeas-corpus state-court state-court-rules supreme-court-precedent |
In Brumfield v. Cain, 135 S. Ct. 2269, 2276, 2282 (2015), this Court made clear that 28 U.S.C § 2254(d)(2) is satisfied when a state court denies an e… |
| 18-8009 |
Ernesto Aguirre v. Ken Clark, Acting Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-02-19 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights collateral-review due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction post-conviction-review procedural-default state-court state-court-procedure state-court-rules |
May a state court ignore its own exception rules to barring untimely or successive petitions without violating the Constitution to Equal Protection of… |
| 18-87 |
Ludwig P. Samson, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Christine R. Samson, Deceased v. Jack W. Gordon, et al. |
Minnesota |
2018-07-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection opportunity-to-be-heard procedural-decision procedural-decisions retroactive-application retroactivity state-court state-court-rules state-statute |
1)
Is a litigant denied due process in the primary
sense of having an opportunity to present his
case when a state's highest court overrules a
consist… |
| 18-5141 |
Taylor Don Frederiksen v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-07-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
appeal appellate-procedure collateral-consequences court-standards criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-review legal-argument prejudice procedural-rules right-to-appeal right-to-counsel state-court-procedures state-court-rules |
Should Mr. Frederiksen continue to suffer and collateral legal consequences from his uncounseled conviction, when the lower state courts fail to compl… |