| 25-6601 |
Melvon Adams v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2026-01-16 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure criminal-appeals equitable-tolling government-motion jurisdictional-limits time-limitations |
Whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)'s time limitations for criminal appeals are subject to equitable tolling after government objection t… |
| 25-685 |
Robert D. Schneider v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2025-12-11 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
criminal-appeals entry-of-judgment firearms-ban military-courts second-amendment ucmj |
Whether military courts of criminal appeals have authority under 10 U.S.C. §§ 860c and 866(d)(2) to correct an unconstitutional firearms ban annotated… |
| 25A676 |
Jimmy ONeal Spencer v. Alabama |
Alabama |
2025-12-09 |
Application |
|
capital-case constitutional-rights criminal-appeals death-penalty due-process habeas-corpus |
Whether the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals violated Mr. Spencer's constitutional due process rights by improperly denying his appeals in a capital … |
| 25-6050 |
David Wood v. Rachel Patton, Assistant Attorney General of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2025-11-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-appeals dna-testing due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review state-court |
Does the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' fifteen-year, twenty-three case unbroken string of denying DNA testing appeals create a plausible claim that… |
| 25A387 |
Robert D. Schneider, et al. v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2025-10-03 |
Presumed Complete |
|
18-usc-922 appellate-jurisdiction court-martial criminal-appeals firearm-prohibition military-justice |
Whether military courts of criminal appeals have jurisdiction to correct errors related to post-conviction firearm prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922 |
| 24-6117 |
Michael Eric Pennington v. Texas |
Texas |
2024-12-11 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-review criminal-appeals ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-interpretation legal-precedent trial-procedure |
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision was contrary to established Supreme Court precedent |
| 24-5736 |
James Ray Pendergraft v. Texas |
Texas |
2024-10-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-review criminal-appeals ineffective-assistance lesser-included-offense procedural-error trial-record |
Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals improperly denied a lesser included offense instruction and found counsel not ineffective, and whether the… |
| 23A1052 |
Richard E. Glossip v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2024-05-24 |
Presumed Complete |
|
certiorari criminal-appeals death-penalty eighth-amendment execution supreme-court |
Whether the Eighth Amendment permits the execution of a death row inmate who challenges the constitutionality of the state's method of execution |
| 23-5584 |
Raymond L. Rogers v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-09-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-appeal criminal-appeals due-process grand-jury-indictment jurisdiction jurisdictional-review merits-determination standing subject-matter-jurisdiction tenth-circuit threshold-question |
Did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals commit a reversible error when it resolved the merits of the petitioner's criminal direct appeals review withou… |
| 22-7404 |
Tomas Jaramillo v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-04-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal-rights attorney-client-communication attorney-consultation consultation-duty criminal-appeals criminal-defendant criminal-procedure flores-ortega-standard ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-appeal sentencing |
Whether an attorney has failed to consult within the meaning of Roe v. Flores-Ortega |
| 22-7339 |
Holly Harvey v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2023-04-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-Amendment appellate-rights criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process georgia-courts habeas-corpus ocga-5-6-35 post-conviction-remedies |
Due-Process |
| 22-6696 |
Rudy Garcia v. Texas |
Texas |
2023-02-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-appeals due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-standards precedent prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court-precedent trial-counsel |
Does the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' dismissal of Petitioner's habeas claim conflict with their previous decision of a similar claim? |
| 22-6142 |
Taj Collier v. Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2022-11-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
aedpa constitutional-rights criminal-appeals criminal-appeals-reform-act fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment strickland-standard |
Whether the Florida courts of appeals provide for evidentiary hearings to determine Strickland's mixed question of law and fact |
| 22-5742 |
Reggie D. Caswell v. Steven Racetti |
Second Circuit |
2022-10-03 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence criminal-appeals due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus pro-se pro-se-appeal sentencing-consequences trial-exhibits |
Whether a state that permits pro se criminal appeals must provide a complete and sufficient record for the appeal, as required by the Due Process and … |
| 22-5702 |
Henry Clay Smith, III v. Alabama |
Alabama |
2022-09-28 |
Denied |
IFP |
alabama-court-of-criminal-appeals circuit-court civil-rights criminal-appeals due-process executive-order judicial-review mandates standing |
Whether the record shows that the two (2) circuit court cases have been validated by an executive order from the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, as… |
| 20-8109 |
Walter Crayton v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
2021-05-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
4th-amendment assigned-counsel child-pornography civil-rights criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process free-speech legal-representation post-conviction search-and-seizure trial-court |
Whether the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court erred in affirming the defendant's conviction for possession of child pornography, second offense, de… |
| 20-7279 |
Ong Vue v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2021-03-01 |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence criminal-appeals due-process fourteenth-amendment laches procedural-bar state-criminal-appeals |
Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals application of a state procedural bar and laches to Petitioner's actual innocence claims is contrary to… |
| 19-8300 |
Clark Milton Hyden v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2020-04-20 |
Denied |
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP |
barker-framework barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-appeals due-process fairness-and-prejudice indigent-counsel indigent-defendant speedy-trial |
Did the delay in Petitioner's first appeal as of right from his criminal conviction violate the Due Process Clause? |
| 19-7722 |
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr. v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2020-02-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violations criminal-appeals due-process federal-procedural-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure standing state-court-rules state-statutes statutory-interpretation supreme-court-error |
Did the Virginia Supreme Court err in denying Audrel Una Weston Jr.'s petition for writ of certiorari? |
| 19-1011 |
Eric F. Kelly v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2020-02-13 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review court-martial court-of-appeals-for-the-armed-forces court-of-criminal-appeals courts-martial criminal-appeals due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction military-court military-courts remand |
Whether a military Court of Criminal Appeals must review the results of a court martial anew when the court previously reviewed the case but its judgm… |
| 19-7120 |
Gilbert Sanchez v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-12-31 |
Denied |
IFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey blakely-v-washington criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus in-re-winship jury-trial right-to-trial-by-jury sixth-amendment texas-constitution |
Is the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution violated when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denies an Applicant habeas relief base… |
| 19-5272 |
Pereneal Kizzee v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-appeals criminal-procedure-error-correction criminal-sentencing federal-appeals federal-law felony-offense fifth-circuit firearm-possession guidelines-enhancement judicial-discretion judicial-integrity plain-error plain-error-review sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the Fifth Circuit violated federal law when it refused to exercise its discretion to correct the forfeited error that seriously affected the f… |
| 18-9233 |
Michael Perales v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-05-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-appeals criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process plain-error procedural-reasonableness reasonableness sentencing sentencing-explanation sentencing-guidelines sentencing-procedure |
Is a district court's gross failure to explain an above-range sentence or to respond to arguments for a lesser sentence reversible on plain error? |
| 18-9153 |
Albert Randolph v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-05-07 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeals constitutional-law constitutional-provisions criminal-appeals criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus legal-review prosecutorial-misconduct standing statutory-provisions supreme-court writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in denying Petitioner a new trial? |
| 18-8723 |
Miles Sterling Bench v. Oklahoma |
Oklahoma |
2019-04-08 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment affidavit civil-rights competency costs criminal-appeals death-penalty declaration due-process filing-fees in-forma-pauperis indigent indigent-status mental-illness oklahoma-law supreme-court-procedure writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment prohibits the execution of a person with severe mental illness |
| 18-484 |
Melvin Charles Pettigrew v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-10-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-appeals due-process fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus post-conviction-review state-court substantive-review texas |
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas violated the Petitioner's right to due process of law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the … |
| 18-6092 |
Robert Dion Ables v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2018-09-26 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
appellate-review criminal-appeals criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-plain-error-review empirical-analysis empirical-foundation-of-guidelines guideline-2g2.2 judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-policy substantive-reasonableness substantive-reasonableness-of-sentences |
Whether factual error is categorically immune from plain error review? |
| 18-5848 |
Darrell Darcell Darby v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional criminal-appeals cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process prison-conditions search-and-seizure sentencing standing takings |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Fourth and Eighth Amendments were violated |