Raymond L. Rogers v. United States
Immigration
Did the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals commit a reversible error when it resolved the merits of the petitioner's criminal direct appeals review without first asking and answering the threshold jurisdiction question?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; ' (1). DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT ‘COURT OF APPEALS COMMIT A REVERSIBLE 7 : > ERROR WHEN IT RESOLVED THE MERITS OF YOUR PETITIONER'S “CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEALS REVIEW WITHOUT FIRST ASKING AND . ANSWERING THE THRESHOLD JURISDICTION QUESTION ALL REVIEWING COURT!S MUST FIRST RESOLVE BEFORE PROCEEDING TO A MERITS I DETERMINATION? u : (2). DID THE KANSAS DISTRICT COURT DEVOID ITSELF OF SUBJECT AND . PERSONAL MATTER JURISDICTION WHEN THE COURT DISMISSED THE ". GRAND JURY'S JUNE 21, 2011, FIRST SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT . IN YOUR PETITIONER'S CRIMINAL CASE? oO THE COURT DISMISSES THE GRAND JURY'S SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT _ AND WITHOUT ANY NEW INDICTMENT RETURNED IN THE CRIMINAL CASE? , nc?) . .