| 23-6869 |
Corey Jarren Forbito v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-02-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2nd-amendment certiorari-petition circuit-split civil-rights constitutional constitutional-challenge due-process firearms gun-rights second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? |
| 23-6641 |
Cedric A. Gray v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2024-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional constitutional-interpretation due-process fifth-amendment miranda-v-arizona miranda-warning prophylactic-procedures prophylactic-rule self-incrimination text-history-tradition |
Should this Court overturn the prophylactic procedures announced in Miranda v. Arizona and return to an interpretation of the Fifth Amendment which is… |
| 23-6632 |
Jasen Randhawa v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2024-01-31 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional constitutional-rights criminal-procedure deterrence due-process general-deterrence sentencing sentencing-discretion social-science social-science-evidence |
Does a court violate a defendant's right to due process when a lengthy sentence is based upon mistaken information that a severe sentence will deter o… |
| 23-5906 |
Carey Ackies v. United States |
First Circuit |
2023-10-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights constitutional constitutional-rights direct-appeal due-process ineffective-assistance procedural-prerequisites sixth-amendment standing strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Whether Ackies has satisfied all procedural prerequisites necessary to file COA? |
| 23-33 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, et al. |
California |
2023-07-11 |
Denied |
|
antitrust antitrust-law civil-rights constitutional constitutional-law corporate-influence familial-status housing-discrimination political-influence standing |
Should the U.S. Constitution and federal/state civil-rights, housing, antitrust laws trump the defendants' political-financial influence in dodging li… |
| 22-1248 |
Missouri, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2023-06-28 |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure constitutional executive-order greenhouse-gas procedural-injury regulatory social-cost sovereign-interests standing standing-doctrine statutory |
Whether the Petitioning States' alleged harms to their proprietary and sovereign interests (as well as a completed procedural injury) are sufficient t… |
| 22-1125 |
Don Blankenship v. NBCUniversal, LLC, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-05-18 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
actual-malice constitutional defamation first-amendment media-liability public-figure summary-judgment |
Whether the actual malice standard imposed on public figure plaintiffs in defamation cases should be replaced |
| 22-7096 |
Appellant 1 and Appellant 2 v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-03-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-discretion appellate-procedure breach constitutional contract-interpretation cooperation-agreement crime-of-violence judicial-review sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
Was it unconstitutional and improper for the Fifth Circuit to rely on the government's newly argued application of an undefined contract provision to … |
| 22-6535 |
Murphy Alex Begay v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-01-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment audio-recording civil-procedure constitutional district-court due-process evidence-rules federal-rules-of-evidence rule-106 rule-of-completeness |
Did the District court violate the Petitioners 14th Amendment right of the Due Process Clause, by denying the introduction of the complete audio recor… |
| 22-352 |
Missouri v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-10-14 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
american-rescue-plan-act article-1-section-8 constitutional constitutional-challenge standing tax-mandate tenth-amendment treasury-interpretation |
Does Missouri have standing to challenge Treasury's interpretation of the Tax Mandate as inconsistent with the law? |
| 21-918 |
Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America v. Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-12-21 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
compelled-subsidies constitutional constitutional-review first-amendment free-speech government-speech johanns-precedent johanns-v-livestock-marketing-association private-speech |
Whether otherwise unconstitutional compelled subsidies of private speech are 'government speech,' free from First Amendment review |
| 21-6518 |
Kassie Bond Carpenter v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-12-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional criminal-procedure federal-courts guideline sentencing statutory |
Whether application of 18 U.S.C. §3147 increases the total range of imprisonment to which the defendant may be subject? |
| 21-5918 |
Susan Lloyd v. Joshua Thornsbery, et al. |
Ohio |
2021-10-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional constitutional-violation due-process fair-trial judicial-misconduct jury jury-integrity oath-of-office state-judges |
Are retired state judges constitutional? |
| 20-8464 |
Alberto Solar-Somohano v. The Coca-Cola Company, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-06-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appointment-clause article-i congressional-intent constitutional constitutional-challenge enrolled-bill enrolled-bill-doctrine field-v-clark judicial-review patent patent-trademark-judges |
Whether Arthrex a hoax does not control be foreclosed from deciding appointment clause problem instead is Field v. Clark 143 US 649 (1892) that contro… |
| 19-954 |
Brian E. Harriss v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-30 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
amendment-xvi civil-rights constitutional constitutional-interpretation direct-taxation due-process income-tax ninth-circuit standing statutory tax tax-law |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in recharacterizing the petitioner's right to refute the presumptive evidence of the Commissioner's correctness |
| 19-6032 |
Earnest Lee Langston v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole |
Missouri |
2019-09-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
administrative-law administrative-review collateral-estoppel conflict-of-interest constitutional constitutional-law due-process ex-post-facto parole parole-regulation res-judicata state-regulation statute-of-limitations |
Whether the ex post facto clause is violated when a newly modified state parole regulation is applied |
| 18-8877 |
Reginald Knox v. Unknown Parties |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-04-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law constitutional constitutional-error court-rules district-court due-process federal-statute judicial-review jurisdiction mandamus petition-for-certiorari standing statutory-provisions writ-of-mandamus |
Should the District Court's dismissal of the Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 be reviewed? |
| 18-8455 |
Marc Shiroma v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-03-19 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bank-robbery constitutional crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process federal-bank-robbery ussg-4b1.2 void-for-vagueness |
Is a threatened use of physical force against the person of another an element of federal bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. §2113(a), so as to make it a crime o… |
| 18-7717 |
Byrion Demeco Ferguson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-02-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
1B1.3 amendment appellate-review constitutional criminal-procedure evidence judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing-guidelines u.s-sentencing-commission u.s.-sentencing-commission |
Whether the trial court committed plain error by admitting insufficient evidence applied by the pre-amendment 1B1.3 version of the U.S. Sentencing Gui… |
| 18-7447 |
Christopher E. Lemon v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-01-16 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional constitutional-provision constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit plea-agreement waiver-of-appeal |
Whether the Fifth Circuit erred by enforcing the unconstitutional Waiver of Appeal provision in Petitioner Lemon's Plea Agreement |
| 18-5848 |
Darrell Darcell Darby v. Texas |
Texas |
2018-08-30 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional criminal-appeals cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process prison-conditions search-and-seizure sentencing standing takings |
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Fourth and Eighth Amendments were violated |
| 18-251 |
Sheldon Schwartz v. HRI Hospital, Inc., et al. |
Massachusetts |
2018-08-28 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights constitutional constitutional-law due-process employment employment-rights equal-protection free-speech retaliation state-law whistleblower |
Whether the Massachusetts courts erred in refusing to consider the Supreme Court's proscription of post-employment retaliation in any profession |
| 18-237 |
Gary Thomas and Felix Parrilla v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2018-08-23 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
6th-amendment civil-procedure conspiracy-venue constitutional constitutional-venue cooperating-witness criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure government-witness manufactured-venue prosecutorial-discretion sixth-amendment venue venue-determination venue-manipulation venue-provisions witness-cooperation |
Whether it is permissible under the venue provisions of the U.S. Constitution Article III, § 2, cl. 3; the Sixth Amendment; and Federal Rules of Crimi… |