Should the U.S. Constitution and federal/state civil-rights, housing, antitrust laws trump the defendants' political-financial influence in dodging liability for housing-discrimination, civil-rights-deprivation, antitrust violations against protected classes?

QUESTION PRESENTED | SHOULD THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, ; 1[st-7th-14th AMENDMENTS, U.S. FAIR HOUSING ; ACT, U.S. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT, UNITED STATES SHERMAN : AND CLAYTON ANTITRUST ACTS, CALIFORNIA UNRUH ACT, CALIFORNIA UNFAIR COMPETITION ACT AND CALIFORNIA FRAUD STATUTE TRUMP-OUTWEIGH THE DEFENDANTS'IRVINE COMPANY LLC,THE, THE IRVINE APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, NEWPORT ; BLUFFS, LLC, BORDEAUX APARTMENTS LLCS' ; POLITICAL-FINANCIAL INFLUENCE IN DODGING LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS OF HOUSING DISCRIMINATION, CIVIL RIGHTS ; DEPRIVATION, ANTITRUST FEDERAL AND ii STATE PROTECTIONS AGAINST CATHOLICCHRISTIAN, MEXICAN HERITAGE, MALE, FATHER OF FOUR-FAMILIAL STATUS, MINORITY?