No. 22-6535
Murphy Alex Begay v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment audio-recording civil-procedure constitutional district-court due-process evidence-rules federal-rules-of-evidence rule-106 rule-of-completeness
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District court violate the Petitioners 14th Amendment right of the Due Process Clause, by denying the introduction of the complete audio recording of the Plaintiffs statement violating Rule 106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence 'Rule of Completeness'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : : Did the District court violate the Petitioners 14th Amendment wight of the Due Process Clause, by denying the introduction of the complete audio recording of the Plaintiffs statement violating Rule : (106 of the Federal Rules of Evidence 'Rule of Completeness’.
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2023)
Attorneys
Murphy A. Begay
Murphy Alex Begay — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent