No. 18-8877
Reginald Knox v. Unknown Parties
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law constitutional constitutional-error court-rules district-court due-process federal-statute judicial-review jurisdiction mandamus petition-for-certiorari standing statutory-provisions writ-of-mandamus
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the District Court's dismissal of the Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 be reviewed?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED I Should this Court grant Certiorari to determine if the District Court committed a Constitutional error : by dismissing Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus as described by 28 U:S.C. § 1361. Mr. Knox now petitions this Court for a Writ of Certiorari and presents the following facts in support of the question above. i
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-16
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Dewayne Burton to respond filed.
2019-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Warden Dewayne Burton
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent