No. 24-6117
Michael Eric Pennington v. Texas
IFP
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-appeals ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-interpretation legal-precedent trial-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-02-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision was contrary to established Supreme Court precedent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is the Court of Criminal Appeals' decision contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent? 2. Was Trial Counsel Ineffective in conceding Pennington's guilt at trial?
Docket Entries
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2024-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2025)
Attorneys
Michael Pennington
Michael Eric Pennington — Petitioner