No. 18-5141
Taylor Don Frederiksen v. Texas
IFP
Tags: appeal appellate-procedure collateral-consequences court-standards criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-review legal-argument prejudice procedural-rules right-to-appeal right-to-counsel state-court-procedures state-court-rules
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Frederiksen should continue to suffer prejudice and collateral legal consequences from his uncounseled conviction when the lower state courts fail to comply with their own rules and procedures
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | — is) Should Mr. Frederiksen continue to suffer prejudice and collateral legal consequences From his uncounseled conviction, when-~ the— — lower state courts fail to comply with , their own rules and procedures ? | QD Whether Mr. Frederiksen should be , afforded his night of appeal, when the convicting court fails to notify him of ifs judgment until all time periods and grace periods fo do so have passed” i
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)
Attorneys
Taylor Frederiksen
Taylor Frederiksen — Petitioner