No. 18-8009
Ernesto Aguirre v. Ken Clark, Acting Warden
IFP
Tags: civil-rights collateral-review due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction post-conviction-review procedural-default state-court state-court-procedure state-court-rules
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a state court ignore its own exception rules to barring untimely or successive petitions without violating the Constitution to Equal Protection of the Laws and Due Process?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. May a state court ignore its own exception rules to barring untimely or successive petitions without violating the Constitution to Equal Protection of the Laws and Due Process? ; ; 2. May California’s post-conviction collateral review scheme to file claims of ineffective assistance of counsel fall within the Martinez v. Ryan (2012) 132 SCt : 1309 and Trevino v. Thaler (2013) 133 SCt 1911 decisions for “cause”?
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2019)