Does California Supreme Court create unconstitutional burden on Petitioner's rights abstaining from compelling the state trial court to enter the final judgment of dismissal in a civil action?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Under California state law, appealable judgments are only those, which were written, signed by judicial officer, and filed as a public record (Kurwa v. Kislinger (2017) 4 Cal.5th 109.) (Kurwa) . duties of a trial court include to provide the final judgment; Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2007) 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 534 (Alan) any minute order is not an appealable order until it is signed and filed). Petitioner is not able to obtain a written, signed, filed order of dismissal of actions, wherein he was an aggrieved party, including immediately appealable interlocutory ruling in 2019. All Petitioner's attempts to redress his grievances through the writ proceedings were summarily . : denied, therefore those refusals formed into the _ following constitutional issues (Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252, (1959) — a refusal to accept the appeal ~ formed into federal constitutional issues): (1) Does California Supreme Court create , unconstitutional burden on Petitioner’s rights abstaining from compelling the state trial court to enter the final judgment of dismissal in a civil action? (2) Has the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs’ defamation claims . , against a religious speaker in the light of the Federal Constitution and the First Amendment in ‘ particular? i