Kent Glen Williams v. Alan Stewart, et al.
Securities
Whether Rule 3.2 of the Idaho Department of Correction violates the First, Fourteenth, and Petition Clauses of the U.S. Constitution
No question identified. : ; | QuesTionsS WResenTen 02s The. United shotes District court for the. Disteict of = daho | | o 392, which \mposes only pos “Prose fasavers a twewty (20) [ _ ze lwot on awil ( ghts_pesrtions (42. uS.3/4.%3) Vholate. the Test | ni Gucleedth Amevdment to fhe Umted shakes constitution ¢ | Tighether cule 342 uralotes the Due Process and Equal profectiod IPlouse. of the Guckew/th Amewdment sine ct only tncgets anc yudices WaAlgent pose. Prisonels who ca wot afford ain rrucwey +b Gle Merc 42 use $1983 complains fac therm. | ofher rule 342, violates the aght b pettion urdec the. fest ba ndicmines petitions. ; ; : } i , | F