Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in dismissing the petitioner's appeal by stating 'Failed to Pay the Docketing & Filing Fees' where the petitioner clearly shows he was unable to pay the fees due to indigence

No question identified. : Quesbion(s) Presente A I Wow Can Me Couch oF AR PRS For Lhe ENevendy rcuth DiS ge My APRRA\ By SNating “Failed Yo Pay the Dock ering 8 Fi Ving Fees bg Wherg iy Cleasly Shakes on AS Can ix B onrne Dake o€ WQ0)1R onder Arann Meation Kot leave vo Pro ceed inYor Ma Pauhe ris ® J aX. Kaw Can My Akal BeDismigsed Where A Nearly Stokes ON EX iy D iq os ae hae < ee Onde Dore, oF WH) Qorg — Wag Charged 350 Datars For € Rera\ Qovek yy a) W\ocee Divkren vek Fy AY FEE Fon dhe Federal 3.Did de Federal Courk Coc ne Macon Divig x . ‘\y WOMEKEWeysh Fond Accound Fre \Q aes ee “ve Ary \engy Our oF NYRZY 148 Tidthis Month 2 W Whe Ane Diskrick Tudgg Adeh&e\ ine RePork Race Meter: Va ARPANAK B in Ais Pedy: . Adakion On \7 7) 0\9, ; . ion For Writ of SF orag, Deoesah Ay Recommrrdedion Stake hak T Wag granted leave Le e, . ; & Retory 3 52a APRA K RB on he Dake EOWA) Was vy a \ Seed Foren Rates? Courk of ARPaa\s Foo De Bvevendy RUecuit 5 Y i) x “lake Wea Nhe N ay From MrFea\ing the Disks; CH Judge Decks ENY AN “y \ega\ Raterwlor Courh Rouse . 8) SYON ONVIRQ) iq +o Ly, Cieeut¥ on ty gre Ostet Judge ResPonds ro Thad \ * rade Distese JAAN ANS Angers & Secs. SeX€r Frame Exevenhh Possible when WW Re YAY Fag Nk PQY aS Charged § 30D. 5 Nid. How is Dade bevthen 9 Menocalsle Distiey Toke Agrees isu, n Va ee ROR _ : . Ne \\ asistoate P8898 Says in WiS/HR oF ee Ingy nD AS Monoraliig Howl cag sDiskeick Svage Crane ig / Yer Mado \ —_ MaPerig, Nok Pay ve Sieg Fee aN Say “ Vaials TaN a . a SARs Foe The Ekeventh, Crreurk Do Ant \\ + SS MY SeeFying Be Diskesed ASAE ‘CX Cows ‘\ S Poe Aivout he ‘ing Feed