| 24-5449 |
Kimberly Ann Smith v. Menard, Inc. |
Eighth Circuit |
2024-09-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure-rules electronically-stored-information evidence-preservation preponderance-standard rule-37-sanctions spoliation |
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals holds that, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37(e), before a Rule 37(e)(2) remedy can be awarded, there… |
| 19-1413 |
Armin Abazari v. Department of Education, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
5th-amendment 7th-amendment civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules complaint dismissal due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-civil-procedure first-amendment objections procedural-due-process sovereign-immunity standing |
1. Whether the District Court must A.
consider an opportunity to present objections
under F.R.C.P. §72(b)(2) prior to a ruling on a
dismissal of a Com… |
| 19-1397 |
Michele Gray v. Department of Justice |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure-rules forma-pauperis improper-service judicial-procedure lower-court-decision motion-to-dismiss ninth-circuit-court time-extension writ-of-certiorari |
1) Can a party request extended time to file a petition for Writ of Certiorari within 60 days of the lower court decision.
2) Can a party request to … |
| 19-7614 |
Jason Perry v. Richard Brown |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-02-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-rule civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence habeas-corpus judicial-review standing state-court |
1. Whether the Courts violated Rule 2/a) Governing Section 2254 Cases?
2. Whether withholding an officer's statement until the habeas Corpus stage is… |
| 19-7276 |
Ketut Pujayasa v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-01-15 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules due-process judicial-discretion prejudice prisoner prisoner-litigation prisoner-rights pro-se pro-se-litigant rule-4a6 time-limitation timeliness |
Did the District court and Appellate Court err in concluding that Mr. Pujayasa's Motion to Re-Open Time to File Appeal (6) motion, which was sent on F… |
| 19-6958 |
Renee L. McCray v. Samuel I. White, P.C., et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-12-16 |
Denied |
IFP |
bona-fide-error civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules debt-collection due-process fair-debt-collection-practices-act fdcpa federal-appeals federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fourth-circuit jerman-v-carlisle rehearing standing summary-judgment |
1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred when it denied the Petitioner's petition for rehearing, when the United States District C… |
| 19-5974 |
Duane L. O'Malley v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-09-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals circuit-operating-rule civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules criminal-procedure criminal-rule-33 direct-appeal due-process judicial-assignment motion-appeal newly-discovered-evidence panel-reassignment recharacterization standing |
DID THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS (CA7 ) VIOLATE CIRCUIT OPERATING RULE 6(b) WHEN FAILING TO REASSIGN THE "SUCCESSIVE MOTION APPEAL" PANEL ("C"… |
| 18-537 |
Booth James v. Montgomery Regional Airport Authority, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-24 |
Denied |
|
administrative-remedies civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules civil-rights constitutional-rights discovery-violations employment-termination evidence-substitution fraud free-speech proximate-cause whistleblower-protection whistleblower-retaliation |
Could a reasonable jury have found that Mr. Perry retaliatory attitude toward Officer James for whistleblowing, to a government representative, the pr… |
| 18-5471 |
Roman Gabriel Contreras v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-procedure-rules constitutional-rights dog-sniff due-process federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion precedent probable-cause procedural-rules search-and-seizure standing vagueness |
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appealls (9th) did not follow rules being Federal Rules of Appeallete Procedure 'and precedent caselaw. By either ruling or… |