Whether a reasonable jury could have found that the petitioner's termination was in retaliation for whistleblowing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1). Could a reasonable jury have found that Mr. Perry retaliatory attitude toward Officer James for whistleblowing, to a government representative, the proximate cause for his decision to terminate Officer James employment? 2). Did Mr. Perry violate Civil Rules of Procedures 11 & 37 by willfully and intentionally introducing substitute evidence, (Montgomery Regional Airport Authority Employee Handbook./ Lost and found Policy) into court records in place of the original (Montgomery Regional Airport Authority Employee Handbook / Lost and found Policy) evidence during discovery, which has an adverse impact on Officer James Constitutional rights? ‘| RECEIVED OCT 23 2018 : THE CLERK . Cree COURT OS. li .