No. 21-6508
Daniel Jones v. Kathy Hochul, Governor of New York, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appointment-of-counsel circuit-court-jurisdiction circuit-court-split civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-discretion motion-for-counsel pro-se-litigant standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the appeal pursuant to 25 U.S.C.§ 1915(e) based solely on the denial of the motion for appointment of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION ERR AS A MATTER OF LAWIN DISMISSAL OF APPEAL PURSUANT TO 25 U.S.C.§ 1915(e), BASED SOLELY ON DENIAL OF MOTION FOR ~ APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 2. WHETHER THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISION CONFLICTS WITH OTHER CIRCUIT COURT DECISIONS FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL BASED SOLELY ON A MOTION FOR APOINTMENT OF :COUNSEL ,
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-07
Waiver of right of respondent Governor Hochul to respond filed.
2021-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Governor Hochul
Andrea Oser — Office of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent
Andrea Oser — Office of the New York State Attorney General, Respondent