No. 19-8291
Willis J. Yazzie v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process habeas-corpus judicial-procedure pro-se pro-se-litigant standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals disregarded this Court's decision in Buck v. Davis to advise a pro-se litigant about the COA procedure by deciding the merits of the case before denying a COA
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ae “Whether the court. of ‘appeals: disregarded this Court's decision in Buck v. Davis to . "a pro-se litigant about the COA’ procedure by deciding the merits .of tire case: before denying @ COA. i ea! oo ) oe i -. LISTOFPARTIES . [x] All parties. appear in the caption of the casé ‘on the cover page. So ae a '[ ] All parties do-not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of se : _ + +, all
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent