Lavont Flanders, Jr. v. United States
HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Question not identified
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has entered a decision in conflict to the United States Supreme Court and other Circuit Courts which prohibit SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL of a court action without Notice and Opportunity to Respond. (2) Should the United States Supreme Court have precedent instructing all courts to resolve all constitutional claims in a habeas petition, regardless whether habeas relief is granted or denied, including claims that the Petitioner groups into an overall ground for relief regardless of harmless error. (3) If a pro-se litigant's mail is destroyed, or becomes open while being processed at the United States Postal Service making the filing untimely, is this sufficient to warrant equitable tolling because of extraordinary circumstances beyond the pro-se litigant's control and unavoidable even with diligence. (4) When Congress passed 18 U.S.C. $1591, sex trafficking,, of children, was it the statute's congressional intent to punish persons who engage only in adult prostitution? , Mr. Flanders moves to notify this Court of his constitutional challenge to 18 U.S.C. §1591. i ‘i