Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by U.S. district judges, and does the pattern/practice violate the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the due process rights of appellants to meaningful access to courts?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Question 1: | | A. Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by U.S. district judges, and B. does the pattern/practice violate the | independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the due process rights of appellants to , meaningful access to courts? , Question 2: Do U.S. district judges have power to deny explicit, sworn §455 recusal motions directed to magistrates committing acts of apparent misconduct in support of a party? ! 1 In this case, the apparent misconduct of Magistrate Candy W. Dale is literally case-dispositive, as shown below, Question 2, Pg. | 10 | | i |