No. 22-6506
Andrew Simpson v. Carl Davis, dba Davis Construction Co., et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-1915 civil-rights court-appointed-counsel due-process exceptional-circumstances informa-pauperis legal-representation mental-illness pro-se-litigant
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When acting under 28 USC 1915 Informa paupers, do a mental illness qualify as a 'exceptional circumstance' for appointment of council? Do a mentally ill person have Right to legal Representation? Can a District Court Terminate a mentally ill person's Attorney, without appointing representation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a When acting under 28 USC 1915 Informa paupers, “Do a mental illness, qualify as a “exceptional circumstance” for appointment of council? Do a mentally ill person have Right to legal Representation? Can a District Court Terminate a mentally ill person’s Attorney, without appointing representation? 4
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-04-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-09
Waiver of right of respondents United States to respond filed.
2023-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent