Does requiring an expert witness to present medical information create an undue burden on the courts and unfairly prejudice pro se, indigent litigants?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does requiring an expert witness to present medical information, pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 201 Judicial Notice,. create an undue burden on the courts and unfairly prejudice pro se, indigent litigants? | | 2. May a lower court deny a request for Judicial Notice pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 201 (b) by claiming that the Defendants would be precluded from offering contrary evidence, even when the request was made to rebut evidence given by : the defendants in support of their Summary Judgment Motion? 3. When a lower court requires a pro se, indigent litigant to employ a medical expert to submit medical information pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 201, does the court abuse its discretion when it denies the appointment of an expert pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. Rule 706 to meet the requirement? 4. If the defendants in a lawsuit provide false expert declarations to the court in order to mislead the court about the medical standard of care for the hepatitis c virus, does the misrepresentation meet the requirements of a Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b)(3) Motion? i