No. 19-6694

Tim Sundy v. Martha C. Christian, Judge, et al.

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2019-11-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-court civil-rights constitutional-rights court-officer criminal-activity due-process equal-protection pro-se-litigant pro-se-litigants property-rights state-court-officers takings
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether pro se litigants are immune from criminal activity by State court officers

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether pro se litigants are immune from criminal activity, undue interference and/or transgressional acts by State of Georgia court officers, with that immunity requiring the State of Georgia court officers to provide full Notice or show cause that court officers can criminally tamper with official court records to deprive pro se litigants of a complete record as well as violate pro se litgant’s rights of access to the court, due process, equal protection, and security in their papers, as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the State of Georgia and the United States, with Respondents ultimately, in this case, depriving Petitioner of private property without just compensation? i .

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-27
Petition DENIED.
2020-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent Nova Casualty Company to respond filed.
2019-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)

Attorneys

Nova Casualty Company
Karen E. WoodwardCruser & Mitchell, LLP, Respondent
Karen E. WoodwardCruser & Mitchell, LLP, Respondent
Tim Sundy
Tim Sundy — Petitioner
Tim Sundy — Petitioner