Is petitioners claims Time Barred Under The Favorable Termination Rule Founded under Heck V. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) When he brought the 1983 suit Nine months after such favorable Termination?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1). Is petitioners claims Time Barred Under The Favorable Termination Rule Founded under Heck V. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) When . he brought the 1983 suit Nine months after such favorable Termination? (2) Was the Order Granting the briefing Schedule too suggestive asto the claims petitioner had to address,as petitioner is pro-se? (3). Is Haines V.~Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972) StillGood law? (4) Did the Sixth Circuit violate the Fifth Amendment Equal protection by denying petitioners suit but Remanding a similarly Situated individuals identical claims? (5) Is it ever proper for a court to dismiss a petitioners claims without allowing an amendment, or is it proper for courts to tail tU¥ address all substantive claims for relief? ‘ \ L ; 7 pe a 5 .