Whether the district court's errors and abuses demonstrate antagonism toward a pro se litigant and favoritism toward a federal defendant

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court’s hundreds of deliberate factual and legal errors and abuses of discretion, and the circuit court’s summary affirmance of those errors and abuses, demonstrate such deep-seated antagonism toward a pro se litigant and favoritism toward a federal defendant as to make fair judgment impossible. ; 2. Whether a federal district court has jurisdiction to stay federal agency personnel actions in a whistleblower reprisal appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board when the Board has no sitting members to grant a stay, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 703. 3. Whether an employee of a federal corporation has an implied right of action for political discrimination pursuant to 5 U.S.C § 2801 and 5 U.S.C. § 2302, when the federal corporation has a history of corrupting its grievance process — the federal employee’s sole source of relief.